I think the methodological cautions about the "web page per fatality" experiment are valid, but some of the other things are spurious or contradictory.
There are more international journalists in Jerusalem than in any other city except Washington DC. I have heard attempts to handwave this, but it seems a significant metric of excessive interest.
My point was to make us aware that AI mimics public perceptions (“learns” it). As more prejudicial and anti-Jewish posts will continue to appear on the internet, as more AI will spit it back to the public. The danger is that there is a perception of objectivity since it produced by a machine and not the humans. I realize that this perception is erroneous, but I hear this sentiment expressed. I simply wanted to bring attention to it.
very helpful analysis
I think the methodological cautions about the "web page per fatality" experiment are valid, but some of the other things are spurious or contradictory.
There are more international journalists in Jerusalem than in any other city except Washington DC. I have heard attempts to handwave this, but it seems a significant metric of excessive interest.
My point was to make us aware that AI mimics public perceptions (“learns” it). As more prejudicial and anti-Jewish posts will continue to appear on the internet, as more AI will spit it back to the public. The danger is that there is a perception of objectivity since it produced by a machine and not the humans. I realize that this perception is erroneous, but I hear this sentiment expressed. I simply wanted to bring attention to it.